Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lot Long
by Gary E. Andrews - 11/10/26 11:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 9,239 Likes: 100
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 9,239 Likes: 100 |
There was a time when I thought musical copyright only applied to lyrics and melody. But looking at a lot of the cases tried, it's clearly about more than that. The Katy Perry lawsuit over her song "Dark Horse" was lost because of the synth riff...which I guess is melodic...but it seems odd to me that you can't do that, but you CAN write unlimited blues songs with the exact same structure and similar melodies. Than there's Led Zeppelin. This isn't the first time they've been accused of lifting other people's stuff...I don't think an album went by without them re-writing and rocking up a blues classic with basically the same lyrics and claiming it as their own, entirely. Here's a good list: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/led-zeppelins-10-boldest-rip-offs-223419/I don't know where the line should be drawn, but Zeppelin definitely liked to push the boundaries further than any other band I can recall. I guess a riff is considered a melody. If you take most of the classic riffs of all time.... Smoke on the Water, Back In Black, Brown Sugar, etc, youd be sued instantly if you took it note for note, or even close. But if you took "In the Still Of the Night" there are so many songs that sound exactly like it. I think true original music is rare, but I think without copyright protection, why create anything? There's way more to songs than melody and lyric. if you remove The Beatles voices and performances and arrangements, and had somebody else do them, they will not come close to being as great. It will sound good probably and be enjoyed by many, but wont be as iconic. Creativity is in all parts of music, why cant Stewart Copeland copyright his drum beats? He has some amazing beats. Why cant some vocal groups copyright their harmony structure. Why cant somebody copyright a guitar sound they formulated and made popular? I could find the sounds on Guitar Rig to any classic tune and use it, why arent the creators of such things protected. Even a production technique, why cant wall of sound be protected, if a melody can. its all creativity, from the notes you use to support a melody to the sounds you use, to the style. HOW COME!
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 08/05/19 02:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,177
Posts1,186,195
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Do not endeavor to be the smartest kid in a dumb class. Instead, you are better off being the dumbest kid in the smartest class, where you will be challenged and you will learn. If you aren't growing, you are dying." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|