|
7 members (Gary E. Andrews, texritter, Fdemetrio, bennash, Pat Hardy, Everett Adams, 1 invisible),
108,981
guests, and
6,407
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASCAP & AI
by Brian Austin Whitney - 07/09/26 08:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCIO
by Gary E. Andrews - 07/08/26 11:11 PM
|
EG Kight
by Gary E. Andrews - 07/08/26 10:59 PM
|
|
|
Of Virtue
by Gary E. Andrews - 07/08/26 10:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block
by Gary E. Andrews - 07/03/26 05:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 701 Likes: 1
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 701 Likes: 1 |
Donna Ross-Jones’ Post View profile for Donna Ross-Jones Donna Ross-Jones 7mo
The AI Music Crossroads — The Quiet Revolution Begins
ASCAP, BMI, and SOCAN just announced they’ll now register partially AI-generated works. On the surface, it sounds progressive — a nod to innovation and artistic freedom.
But read between the lines, and a deeper truth emerges: this decision doesn’t just make it easier for independent artists to protect their work — it makes it easier for corporations to replace human creators at scale.
Here’s the part no press release will say out loud:
If the major music companies can now legally register and monetize songs that are partially AI-generated, what’s to stop them from hiring one “prompt engineer” to generate hundreds of tracks a day?
They don’t need to hire rooms full of songwriters anymore.
They don’t need session musicians, vocalists, or producers crafting each sound.
They can feed their own catalog into an AI engine — trained on the very songs you and your peers created — and start pumping out “new” content that technically meets the registration criteria.
It’s legal. It’s efficient. And it’s devastating.
If “writing a prompt” now qualifies as “human contribution,” what happens when corporations hire a few prompt engineers and generate thousands of songs a day?
They won’t need songwriters. They won’t need producers. They won’t need musicians. They’ll need data managers.
The creative process is being redefined — not around emotion or expression, but around output.
And that’s the crossroads we stand at today. So when the industry calls this progress, who is it really progressing for?
The Cost for Real Creators
If that happens, here’s what we lose: • Authenticity — real emotion that comes from lived experience, not predictive text. • Livelihoods — fewer jobs for songwriters, musicians, engineers, and producers. • Cultural diversity — when music becomes data-driven, it stops reflecting life and starts reflecting algorithms. • Royalties — even if AI-generated songs earn billions of streams, those dollars will go to corporations, not communities of creators.
This is the quiet automation of artistry. Writing a prompt does not qualify for 'authorship'. Do not list the AI tool as the author. The Copyright Office’s guidance says the AI system is not the author just because you used it. 88 Fed. Reg. 16,190 (Mar. 16, 2023).1 https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...ial-generated-by-artificial-intelligence
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,767
Posts1,184,734
Members21,479
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Do not endeavor to be the smartest kid in a dumb class. Instead, you are better off being the dumbest kid in the smartest class, where you will be challenged and you will learn. If you aren't growing, you are dying." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|