A little bit of hyperbole there Marc, We all know that:

1.) Most of the illegally downloaded music would NOT have been purchased so the "losses" are way over estimated.
2.) Record companies arbitrarily made CD prices really high -- because they could. This helped, over time, reduce CD sales.
3.) If record companies had some "thinking" in their management teams, they could have embraced the download model (ala i-tunes) or subscription model (ala Rhapsody) and could have made illegal downloading feel more "wrong".
4.) Some people don't equate buying records with supporting the artist -- we've all heard the horror stories of past albums selling millions, but somehow the artist "owes" the record companies at the end of it all.

I am not defending illegal downloading, just saying that the record companies and RIAA actually come off as being the bad guys in this situation.

Kevin


"Good science comes in peer reviewed journals. Conspiracy theories come in YouTube videos. "
Kevin @ bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh