Unless the fed govt coerces individuals against their will to comply with govt efforts to achieve ends such as contact tracing...I dont see anything here other than setting up another bureaucracy.
The problem with lifetime bureaucrats is that they often coerce people beyond reasonable or legally justified limits. Flynn, who is no angel, just got a get-out-of-jail-free-card because of bureaucrats deciding that they WERE the law.

Where this will get murky is...the law with regard to national emergencies. I'm not sure what that is.
But inevitably, you will have some fck declaring that it is his or her constitutional right to roam freely infecting people and not be hassled about doing so, because the constitution does not have a specific clause with specific wording that says he or she cannot. And some liaryer will enthusiastically make the case for it, but I suspect that it will be proven wrong. Amongst other things, "promote the general welfare" has a broad interpretation.

Pandemics are messy disruptions..


I have not gotten to this podcast yet. I'm still on the early middle ages podcast, but it might help clear up some incorrect assumptions.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/constitutional-law/id387940173

https://soundcloud.com/sunset-poet-of-texas