Originally Posted by bennash
Originally Posted by bennash
Originally Posted by Fdemetrio
Originally Posted by bennash
[quote=Everett Adams]AI would be a great tool to give great sounding and cheap demos. I've been holding off doing that because of an uncertain future of complete ownership of the song. A demo studio gives you a work for hire contract saying I own 100% of a song, does A! do that or do they claim partial ownership of any future success.


If you used Suno to map out your song , then recorded with humans . You'll own the song . Suno would be just used for production ideas . The publisher would have no idea AI was involved .

Thats exactly what Joe is talking about

But it hasn't been established that re recording it means you own it. You own the recording, but not certain the melody suno generated

As far as I'm concerned you own it anyway, but these laws arw we not sure.


How is anyone going to know Suno was involved , Nobody . The Demo studio gets the song , Here follow what Suno is doing . Session players follow the map.
Unless your really stupid and tell everyone it started in Suno , Loose lips sink ships .


Fair question. And probably moot, cause unless you make significant amount of money, it won't matter.


I wondered how they could know too, apparently Ai detectors can tell if Ai wrote something.. the next logical step method

But if you change it. Add different arrangements, different production tech... then maybe its just an idea generator

One thing that's clear is you are a fraud if you say you are the artist of a suno production


But look at it this way, what if its lyrics you got from suno.

Youd be using the very words it generated.

But I'm still Tryna figure why suno thinks they own it. Maybe nobody does, like publicl domain.

Somebody could then use that melody and wrute new words, but why would they.

Very weird times we live in

Last edited by Fdemetrio; 07/27/26 08:49 PM.