|
6 members (bennash, Gary E. Andrews, texritter, Andy K, 2 invisible),
14,933
guests, and
4,923
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
néomí
by Gary E. Andrews - 07/24/26 08:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,403
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,403 |
Hey, Her Bethness used "supercalifragilisticexpealidocious" in a bluegrass song ("Syllables for Sale"). Yes, it had been used before (only once, though)--but she made it rhyme with something.
I think the whole dictionary is fair game. Yes, one needs to be different--either saying something new, or something old in a new way (there is no point in plowing ground already tilled by folks more famous)--but I ain't avoiding words. If my dead animals need that "heart/apart" couplet, for instance (and considering that they're dead, they may), I'll use it, and not worry.
Joe
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,860
Posts1,185,038
Members21,479
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"The music industry is filled with risk takers, but not so filled with people who educate themselves before taking the leap." –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
