|
8 members (texritter, Kay-lynn Carew, Irwin, Bill Draper, CTthomas, Brian Austin Whitney, Gary E. Andrews, 1 invisible),
89,177
guests, and
5,923
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayside
by Gary E. Andrews - 10/19/26 10:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 528 Likes: 17
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 528 Likes: 17 |
Could it be that your publisher has licensed music (that they have rights to) to a YouTube client (artist) only to discover that the music has been entered into YouTube’s CID program generating a claim? The link provided says YouTube requires writers/composers who tag a piece for CID monitoring must have exclusive ownership of the music, writer side and publisher side you would assume. Sounds like they’re taking it all down and putting it on the originators to upload CID free music to 1.) avoid claims, and 2.) ensuring rights splits reflect current ownership. The implication from your publisher also seems to suggest that some of this music has a convoluted rights pedigree at best, or at worst, someone is trying to claim music they don’t own.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,157
Posts1,186,060
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Quality = Longevity." –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
