Originally Posted by John Voorpostel
You are beginning to experience senior moments in that clarity of yours Marty.

That viewpoint you ascribe to me was never expressed by me....so using that as a basis to open up a discussion is meaningless

Aohn

I’m sorry that 48 hours have lapsed since my last response.

An old guy’s memory may be failing here, but not likely mine.

Back when your like-minded brothers in arms were expressing all sorts of reasons why “gender fluidity” should be considered a scientific fact …and Ketanji Brown would not forthrightly define what a “woman” is, when asked to do so in her SCOTUS confirmation…

I recall a post of yours in which you despairingly showed support and strident sympathy for the gender-fluid viewpoint and the “trans” population.

The reason that I recall it, is because I remember thinking….

“I believe that guy said that his daughter was an MD. I hope that she does not share his confusion about human anatomy. If she does her patients may be at some level of risk.”

However, now you seem to be running back from that.
Despair not, a couple of questions with yes or no answers should clear it up.

?Do you believe that someone who’s body contains 30 trillion Y chromosomes +/-, can declare themselves to be either male or female, and that the rest of us have an obligation to honor and accept that declaration?

?Do you believe that someone who’s body contains 30 trillion Y chromosomes +/-, can declare itself to be female and should then be allowed to compete in sporting events against bodies that contain no Y chromosomes?

I boiled them down to yes-or-now for clarity.

https://soundcloud.com/sunset-poet-of-texas