|
8 members (Fdemetrio, texritter, Michael W. Brown, Guy E. Trepanier, bennash, Everett Adams, 2 invisible),
77,832
guests, and
5,780
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 222
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 222 |
here's what i like to do. keep a track with no verb at all. then clone it and set your verb wetter than you would normally. then in the mix you can get great results by keeping the presence of the non-verbed vocal and still have the verb coming in the backgound.
to open it up i usually have two wet tracks and pan them right and left. group them together and you only have one fader to worry about.
also i agree with cpt.analog's thinking. you might be overkilling the verb since chances are you have natural verb there already.
happy hunting
jt
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,885
Posts1,185,216
Members21,479
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Learn the "tried and true" rules, then break them with premeditated malice!" -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
