Originally Posted by 90 dB


So you have to make a choice:

On one hand you have an organization who has pulled off some of the most amazing technical achievements of mankind. Who has compiled reports of hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific studies, has explained how they have done data analysis and even report the original data for people to do their own analysis.

On the other, you have a fringe group with an agenda who has referred to a study of a geologist (not a climate scientist) who has done a data analysis of his own. That apparently hasn't been published in a reputable journal.

It's your call grin

Scott