|
6 members (Bill Draper, bennash, Fdemetrio, texritter, Michael W. Brown, Everett Adams),
48,723
guests, and
5,658
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,403
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,403 |
Just a couple of bailout thoughts.
I have lived through owning bad investments before. Since I managed to survive, I consider the condition survivable.
My wife and I were the proud owners of a little house in the little lumber mill town of Cascade Locks, Oregon, when the timber market collapsed in the late '70s. Four of the five lumber mills in our town of 800 people closed, and never re-opened. For most of the next ten years, our house was worth less than the $8500 we paid for it in 1977. (For a while, the county was saying it was worth only about $3,000.)
And so what? That the house was worth less than I paid for it meant only that I wasn't going to be selling it any time soon. (We still own it, in fact.) There was a mortgage on the place, and I still had to pay it off, even though I was paying more than the house was worht. Again, so what? My main concern was being able to make the payments (which was occasionally difficult).
The primary people who would be hurt by a real estate collapse under normal conditions (and we do not have normal conditions--I understand that) are those who deliberately bought things they could not afford in expectation that prices would go up and the market would remain "hot." And I'm sorry--they were wrong. The lenders who financed and encouraged such activity get bit, too, under normal conditions. It does seem that we're bailing out the lenders without bailing out the guy who is stuck with the unaffordable house and mortgage. But I wouldn't bail out either one, myself. (I am a firm supporter of Mike "the Foot" Dunbar for President.)
Now, the collapse--and the bailout--are going to have rippleeffects throughout the economy, just like the timber market collapse had ripple effects through my hometown in the 1980s. And a lot of folks who had not done anything wrong will still get bit through no fault of their own. And I frankly don't see a lot being done to help them, either.
Joe
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,884
Posts1,185,205
Members21,479
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Learn the "tried and true" rules, then break them with premeditated malice!" -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|