|
8 members (Everett Adams, KyleCrawford, Gary E. Andrews, bennash, texritter, Michael W. Brown, Fdemetrio, 1 invisible),
25,664
guests, and
5,990
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,096
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,096 |
I realize that my last post sounded a lot like a defense of publihsers. It was an attempt at balance.
Having said all that, let me add that I think writers whould get a reversion clause--every time. Three years...five years...something around there. I have a few single song contracts with Nashville publishers, and each has a reversion clause, although I had to insist on one of them--the publisher was about to make an expensive demo of the song and did not want to see his investment disappear in 3 years. We settled on five, and I thought that was fair.
I cannot imagine a scenario in which I would agree to a contract without a reversion clause. As a publisher I cannot imagine investing my time and money in a song that I did not have for at least 3 years.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,952
Posts1,185,403
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"No matter how much you legally protect a turd, it's still a turd" -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|