|
6 members (bennash, texritter, Michael W. Brown, Fdemetrio, 2 invisible),
87,890
guests, and
5,828
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,893
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,893 |
Hey Mike. Ok this time you haven't got your facts straight Mr Foot lol. Actually Gibson loaned them the design (which they paid for) the dispute is that Gibson says they own the patent to the whole concept behind guitar hero.,. their reasoning being that they have a patent claiming ownership of the idea of a guitar being used in an interactive way. Here is the link to the Inquirer article ( no it's not the national inquirer)
Aiding & abetting? So Gibson takes out a patent in 1999, licenses it's guitar designs and gives permission to use them to Activision, for a game release in 2005, and then sues them in 2008? Umm... I prefer Fenders anyway.
Gibson Guitar Hero story Derek, I hate to burst your bubble, but it's not national inquirer, it's National Enquirer. Sheesh grammatic details, they will always be my downfall  . Thanks for the correction brother Mike  . Derek
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,886
Posts1,185,220
Members21,479
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Learn the "tried and true" rules, then break them with premeditated malice!" -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|