The proof is really not in the pudding.

You can be right about just about anything if you ask somebody to prove or disprove it. Even things that have been proven get disproven time and time again.

For example the phrase speed kills. Can you prove that? No, you can prove that errant driving while speeding kills, but you cant prove that speed itself kills. Speed was there all along you just happened to join it. Speed saves as much as it kills too.

But atheists have the advantage, cause the burden of proof is on the believer. They are the ones claiming that there is a supreme being somewhere out there or in there, or wherever.

They dont have to prove God doesnt exist because nobody has shown a picture of God, or nobody has seen the red sea part, at least not recently. God hasnt appeard through the clouds and said "you guys better cut it out, im getting really ticked off up here"

So the athesist just has to say show me where god is. how do you know he is there?

As somebody once said, even the most religious people look both ways when they cross the street grin

And the Atheist is always going to use the advatage to his or her advantage, and technically they will always be right.

What the Atheist doesnt see, is that the believer is not measuring all things through science or observation. They are tuning into what they believe to be a higher calling.

Then again if you believe something, it's true.