Tony,
One again, I asked a simple and direct question and got a side-wise answer.

Originally Posted by JAPOV
Requiring "definitive proof" of God is a useless circular argument that the fatuous and weak minded cling to with titillating glee. If the wisdom of the Bible isn't enough for you... that's your loss.


But I have AI at my house now. It's called chatMarty and it can understand and interpret Tony-speak.

Chat-Marty's interpretation of Tony-speak is...

"Martin is trying to trap me. Martin is trying to trap me into facing an issue head-on with empirical evidence and intellectual honesty. I'm not going to do that, because I can't. Any argument that I try to advance on that basis for the many proclamations that I assert would hit a wall and fall flat. So I spew-ramble off in some other direction, cast out base insults at his intelligence, etc."


Dang! AI is amazing. I'm guilty of just what it said.
Marty

https://soundcloud.com/sunset-poet-of-texas