Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
My understanding is that the AI developers ‘train’ AI by feeding it tons of published songs and it learns from that. It’s proprietary, so the developers are not disclosing their sampling method. Lawyers will get involved eventually when someone brings a case that opens AI companies to inspection. Absent that, we might never know where AI is sampling from.
That is plausible.
It's only shortcoming may be a stepped-back view that applies common sense and morality.
Common sense goes away when lawyers arguments start. Morality dictates that people should not steal. But we live in a society where many wealthy immoral people have great sway over the "law makers."
I suspect that a lot of money has already been invested by the AI guys in attorneys in order to research a defensible position.
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
"The great thing about a dream come true, is that it is born with a great appetite. That appetite keeps it growing and evolving and it swallows up all those other dreams you have and spits them back out as reality as well." -Brian Austin Whitney
