Originally Posted by Rob B.
Fdem,
over the past decades I‘ve collaborated with tons of talented people. Sometimes I write music for their lyrics, sometimes I contribute lyrics to their music. I call that co-writing. What you have in the end is called a song. What you demonstrate here is actually one of the problems I foresee with AI. People co-write songs with AI generated composers/producers/mixers and take the credit for things they can’t even influence. In Udio you can’t define chord sequences or melodies. It randomly generates music for you. You have zero control over the music production. If you don’t like what it generated you just tell the model to do it again and again and again. Eventually, with a little luck, it will come up with something that you like. The results have nothing to do with your songwriting capabilities. If you co-write with AI shouldn’t you admit that your song is a co-write? In my opinion, Fdem, you are taking credit for the AI generated music and that is a problem I foresee with AI. You are demonstrating this quite well actually.

So when Bernie taupin writes a lyric and gives it to Elton John , he has nothing to do with the song?

So you see how ignorant that is? The concept, the hook, the story, the relatability, the structure, the entertainment Value, the sound of the words

Your insulting lyricists. you are not one, and you don't have a clue, what good ones do

I ain't taking credit for anything, am I charging you? Do you see my with a copyright next to it?

My lyrics have already been posted, and they are copyrighted just by doing that

Your just clueless on so many levels. That's why your songs are bad, you think it's all about cutting and pasting music into your daw

Your not a composer at all

If Mike z started posting songs you and Marty would be kissing his balls, so just go away until you dont know what you're talking sbout

Last edited by Fdemetrio; 05/10/24 04:21 PM.