Originally Posted by John Lawrence Schick
Music Library Report started a thread on this subject: https://musiclibraryreport.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-stable-audio-ai/

I read this quote I think it's a biased we all have, of course it seems that way to us. And u agree with alit he says...but people watching a TV show or movie 90% are not even aware of the music playing.

But think about this John, ai could replace actors and TV shows too. Then the music will be moot.

The hope is humans stay relavent somehow, but dunt expect the average now to give a [naughty word removed] about us

.....
t’s just the dumbest investment and waste of time taking place in AI music space right now. The loss of time and money for any and all companies investing into generative AI Music is going to be massive. What thinking and emotional human being will want an AI track supporting their film, video, show, or ad? I tried a couple of keyworded descriptions and the music coming back at me is just a mish mosh of total garbage. There are no dynamics, there is no arrangement, there is no “feel”…I just do not understand why people are investing in this space?

AI works for generating drum grooves, perhaps bass lines, horn sections, string section parts and lines…but wow…

Invest in great search engines. What music users want is to type in a desription and then get great sounding “human made” compositions to consider. Even the $0 budget crowd will not download this garbage. Why invest in a garbage commodity that no one wants, ever asked for, and can not sound as good as a human made track.

If they can not top ACID, and Garage Band….don’t bother investing into this noise. At least with the older AI programs such as ACID and garage band you get some vibe and human feel out of the arrangements that are essentially “drawn” and assembled together.

Last edited by Fdemetrio; 05/07/24 09:02 PM.