Originally Posted by Brian Austin Whitney
Originally Posted by John Lawrence Schick
As I mentioned before, my publisher makes us sign an agreement that we haven't used AI in any part of the songs we submit. I can't see the music supervisors of any major tv stations using this. They want music free of lawsuits. Although the low-budget stations may opt in for AI. It's definitely killing creativity. And it's more than just a tool to aid musicians. it's a system to do it all without real musicians. In the long run it's terrible for the Music Industry and creative songwriter/ composers. In it's present state, it needs more development. From what I've listened to, everything is quantized, even the vocal tracks. Sounds artificial - oh yeah, it is artificial.

John smile

John, did a realistic sounding Piano sample library replace real piano's in the world? No, it simply expanded the number of people who could make music with those sounds who could not afford a piano or could not lug a real piano to a gig. It is a tool which people with more talent should be able to do something BETTER than a hack using that tool. If not, then why would someone deserve shutting out anyone who can't afford to make music without that tool?

Having access to sounds/ samples totally different Brian. No different than using a pipe organ, electric guitar, etc. Just another sound for the musician to compose and create music from. The udio technology replaces the composer and does the thinking for him. Not even a close analogy Brian. I use the Ivory Piano samples. I still have to compose and record the same as if I were using a Steinway.

John smile

Last edited by John Lawrence Schick; 04/24/24 05:56 PM.