Wow this is a beautiful example of Ayn Rand's observation that if the conclusion seems illogical, go back and examine the premise

AND

Tony WTF is this talking about???
(insert here In 20 words or less?? )


Originally Posted by JAPOV
Marty...

Since liberal socialist democrat ideology is obviously light-years removed from anything "Trump", or anything Constitutionally American..., isn't it logical to conclude that the "derangement" is just for show; A distraction?

Radicalized Dem-wits can attack Trump with impunity, all in the name of "Equitable Democracy", and still maintain the facade of legitimate political discourse.

However, an errant lack of integrity and sincere conviction precludes a direct assault upon their true adversary... Primarily, the forthright morality and adamant rebellion against tyranny delineated in America's founding documents.

It's impossible for a socialist democrat to remain true to his cause, and plainly state his ultimate goal with the same breath. To do so would be an admission of treason and treachery.

If writing ever becomes work I think I'm going to have to stop