Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
Jim, neither of us have either a capitalist or a socialist system, we both have a mixture. There is nothing capitalist about a social program, yet we in the U.S. and apparently in the U.K., have plenty of them. It's the socialist aspects of our systems that put people in positions where they are responsible for the welfare of other people. I believe in programs for health and welfare, I just don't believe they are ever run efficiently by a government. A government protects its own, bureaucracy reigns, folks fall through the net and no one is held responsible. If the lady in your example was being cared for by a church, or by a non-religious, non-governmental agency, then perhaps the government could hold them accountable for her without there being a conflict of interest.
You've got to know your limitations. I don't know what your limitations are. I found out what mine were when I was twelve. I found out that there weren't too many limitations, if I did it my way. -Johnny Cash
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.