Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RY X
by Gary E. Andrews - 09/21/26 04:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
I also want to chime in to say Pete's a great guy...almost scored me an excellent Lyle guitar (I've been kicking myself ever since...that one was rock solid), and he collaborates a lot.
But I still wonder about his "legal" point. Does he own his own melody and lyric in this context? (The context being "create a melody and lyric based on my music...) If he went out and recorded a new song with his melody and lyric...wouldn't he still have your backing chord progression?...
Seems to me that Sub can't be cut out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,043
Posts1,185,691
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"If you are stuck in your musical composing, be unreasonable. Change your environment. If you are stuck in your lyrical efforts, instead of forcing the same old words out, force yourself to do unreasonable things." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
